Technical LibraryArticle: Value of MBD
Explanation: Model-based Development
Issue 3: Easily Joining Complicated Physical Phenomena and Contributing to Improvements in Development Efficiency
In the last issue, we introduced the development intention of JMAG-RT that is one of the solutions for model-based development, resulting outcomes or the functions added with JMAG-Designer10.5. This time, entitling the issue 3 as the model-based development that gives an explanation of "Model-based development effectively connects with multi-complicated physical phenomena to each other" and this issue introduces the scene of model-based development includes is much more wide-range and it goes beyond coupling with the control circuit.
Reading this time's description may let you rediscover the idea of model-based development.
Current Status of the Coupled Analysis using CAE
Reality of CAE utilization
In today's research and development, utilization of CAE is very common, and it is used in wide-range development phase such as concept designs, further studies and reviewing of manufacturing process. From a viewpoint of physical phenomenon, however, the utilization of CAE does not go much beyond the purposes of upgrading and accelerating the design each physical phenomenon. For example, an engineer who needs to evaluate the structure aspect carries out structure CAE like measuring the actual machine using vibration testing machine and vend testing machine to evaluate the right and wrong of the design. Similarly, an engineer who needs to evaluate the electromagnetic force and loss of the motor utilizes the magnetic field CAE like measuring the output characteristics by motor-bench testing or measuring using the LCR meter.
A concern that comes up in this situation, a structural engineer and a magnetic field engineer may evaluate different models each other. Each engineer must comprehensively judge how does the improvement measure conducted in his own task effect to other tasks, or if total optimization is done. Viewing the different model, however, one sometimes makes a wrong synthetic judgment. See Fig. 1.
Fig. 1 Relationship between the Actual Machine and Analysis Model
For example, when considering the countermeasure for the motor vibration that occurs resonance at 1000 Hz, it is very difficult to judge if conduct only one of the countermeasure of magnetic field or structures, or both of them simultaneously. In case conducting the countermeasure that reduces the frequency individually results in again the same resonance frequency at 800 Hz for both of the magnetic field or structures, which are terrible. Considering these two countermeasures simultaneously, such situation does not occur, but the concurrency that is expected to CAE will not be realized. Therefore, interoperating with two different models requires extremely careful management.
Needless to say, all the physical behavior can be checked with the actual products and prototypes, so that will be a help to avoid the engineer of each field to view the different models that will be a problem with CAE. Structural countermeasure enables you to check the magnetic influence instantly. However, creating prototypes forces you to encounter the hard reality of the necessity of lots of time and a large cost.
Insufficient Performance of the Coupled Analysis
Current market released version of coupled analysis simulation successfully realized evaluating the same models linking the same models to each other with multiple themes "in theory". Actually, however, delicate and minute works just like appropriately converting physical quantity of the related model data or adjusting the link timing are required for actual operations, and, in many cases, such works are realized by analysis specialists' advanced technologies and mental strength.
In other words, no user-friendly coupled analysis simulator that lots of front-line engineers can utilize over the entire process of the daily development unfortunately exists. It's an unfortunate reality.
On the contrary, overcoming this problem enables CAE to make a contribution to improvements in development efficiency.
Dealing with the Model-based Development Links Multiple Physical Systems Effectively
What CAE should aim to
Just imagine the role CAD plays in machine designs. The greatest benefit of CAD is not that easy line drawing on the computer but multiple designers can share the information and discuss design studies simultaneously. This benefit enables lots of designers to cooperate, and mounting various functions in the limited space in a short time, and also realizes an excellent design. CAD model includes the information on dimensions, materials, and design know-how.
The target direction of the model-based development is incorporating information on physical behavior to this shared information. The model-based development requires the models that take part in developments to enhance the information traffics, and it makes a contribution to the more smooth communication between involved contact personnel and departments. Needless to say, the ideal model that is used in model-based development is "A model that has all the characteristics of actual machines" and "Easily extract the characteristics". See Fig. 2.
For example, a control technician who is in charge of developing motor drive systems uses the models with being interested in torque characteristics and response to carry out design evaluation of control logic or using device. Concerning magnetic saturation or temperature distribution, however, its influence is only indirect, so control technicians have little interests of that. After handing off the model to a thermal system designer, it will be utilized for thermal system study and evaluated from the view of heating design.
If each person in charge utilizes control models or thermal models, they possibly check the different points, but a model includes all the characteristics and the information is easy to obtain, and information sharing is easy and it leads to improvement of development efficiency or product quality.
Linking multiple analyses must be done easily
Actually, it is not important to figure out the causal connection of complicated physical phenomenon in design works. In fact, actual machine includes the causal connection of complicated physical phenomenon at the point of being object. According to the entered input, outputs the response on the basis of the physical causal connection. An actual machine that is an anorganic substance has no way to its own causal connection, and it is easy for evaluation engineers to make a contribution to problem resolution if they know the causal connection, but they can evaluate good or bad if they do not.
Fig. 2. Framework Change of Coupled Analysis by Introducing Model-based Development
(Upper: Conventional Coupled Analysis ,
Lower: Coupled Analysis under Model-based Development Environment)
After all, the major cause of complicated physical phenomenon is insufficient performance of CAE that cannot express many faces. In order to make model-based development the substitution of actual machine evaluation, you should not force users to understand causal connection.
JMAG give emphasis to basic performance like carrying out highly accurate magnetic field analysis in high speed, and also aims to be ready to utilize its results versatilely in model-based development. It is impossible to reach the goal at a bound, so JMAG is going forward step by step.
Our action assignment at this point is to enhance JMAG's performance so that the machine designer can carry out structural analysis based on the magnetic field analysis results obtained from JMAG using his familiar structural analysis software without learning the JMAG operation. Similarly, another our assignment is enabling JMAG users to carry out magnetic field analysis based on the structural analysis results on his familiar JMAG without learning the operation of structural analysis software. Concerning these points, I would like to introduce the tasks we have already achieved and the ones we are realizing in the near future.
Linking to Abaqus
As I always explain, we have worked hard on enhance the linkage performance to the structural analysis software "Abaqus" manufactured by SIMULIA, and it is widely used in the filed of nonlinear structural analysis. At this point, it is possible to directly read the result file of electromagnetic force distribution obtained by JMAG on Abaqus, and input electromagnetic force to carry out nonlinear structural analysis. Similarly, it is possible to input the eddy current loss obtained by JMAG to perform the thermal analysis. On the other hand, it is possible to directly read the stress distribution file obtained by Abaqus on JMAG, and to perform the magnetic field analysis taking account of the stress magnetic properties. This enables structural analysis engineer to easily utilize the analysis results that is in charge of the electromagnetic field analysis engineer, and of course vise versa, so much higher information sharing is realized.
Also, we are developing a function to maintain linkages even in the phenomenon with model deformation that Abaqus is good at. It is going to be the function that can evaluate a complicated physical phenomenon with shape deformation like electromagnetic forming.
Linking to LMS Virtual.Lab
We plan to enhance the link features with Virtual.Lab manufactured by LMS International who offers solutions for vibration noise analysis. So far, the feature only outputs the data in Nastran format, it is going to directly read the result file of electromagnetic force distribution obtained by JMAG on Virtual.Lab, and to input electromagnetic force to perform vibration noise analysis.
In the development of electrical devices, requirement of vibration noise reduction is getting higher, so we understand we have the responsibility of offering solutions in this field.
We of course keep enhancing the basic features on the electromagnetic field analysis using JMAG, and also plan to make a contribution to the model-based development by strengthen the linkage so that the result can be easily utilize on the other simulation software. It's "OPEN" that has the task to embody it, and we indicate it in the development concept.
Future dream, concept on Virtual Test Bench
We are releasing Virtual Test Bench (from here on VTB) on the next version. VTB has two roles. The first one is the function that easily gives the causal connection to models. It is setting physical causal connections such as of course the magnetic field characteristics and also temperature dependency and stress dependent and so on.
The second one is the function that easily evaluates the magnetic field characteristics. Without attending training sessions or seminars, we plan to prepare the environment of easy evaluation tasks for structural or thermal system designers.
At the first time, an electromagnetic field analysis engineer needs to design the modeling policies or evaluation flows, but we aim to make it possible to utilize them easily by other than electromagnetic field analysis engineers after designing them.
After realizing this, for example, in a case that a structural designer changed the clearance of shrink fitting of stator core, it is possible to perform the structural design while checking how influence appears on the output characteristics of the motor.
Even such accurate analysis as an electromagnetic designer cannot be realized, but you can check the effects of the magnetic field boundary done by design changes that the machine designer made with learning "only few" JMAG operations.
These facts match with the model-based development aim of easily revealing complicated physical phenomenon.
Currently, model-based development (hereinafter MBD) for the field of power electronics、including motors, has yet to get into full swing, but a high percentage of the top ECUs that control motors have already incorporated MBD. Everyone presently using JMAG will eventually be implementing a MBD environment in the future. We talked with Takashi Miyano, Director of the Engineering Department at dSPACE Japan which provides the latest development tools to automotive ECU development and breaking new ground in MBD, to find out more about what is currently happening at the forefront of MBD.
Mr. Takashi Miyano,
Director of the Engineering Department at dSPACE Japan
Trends of MBD
Saying that automobiles have become a bulk of computers is not going too far as shown by the halted production of vehicles due to the microcomputer manufacturers for automobiles that feel victim to the earthquake in northern Japan.
Vehicles have to connect the ECUs utilized in engine units including the engine, power steering, and breaks as well as the ECUs built into amenity units like air conditioning and navigation systems.
A massive overall program is required to combine each of these ECUs that have their own control programs. The overall evaluation is also enormous because each independent unit needs to be confirmed in addition to examining everything at a system level.
V-cycle for MBD
Forefront of MBD
When designing control systems, models of the controller (ECU) for the plant (control targets) models to be controlled are produced and adjusted. One MBD environment provided by dSPACE is the RCP, a prototype ECU capable of quickly supporting a controller model. The RCP includes a small stand-alone MicroAutoBox system and a RapidPro system with expansibility.
A second environment is a HILS used to construct the plant (controlled targets such as motors, actuators, and sensors). Both environments can control the actual control target in real time and verify the ECU in real time. The basic point is to automatically generate the C code for the ECU from the ECU control model created in the upstream processes in real-time simulations using RCP and HILS.
While MicroAutoBox has a calculation capacity that is quite capable of replicating an ECU, a control period of around 100MHz/100nsec can be achieved using an FPGA board when required for extremely high performance calculations in areas like power electronics-related modeling or image recognition. The MBD environments provided by dSPACE are MicroAutobox, a model to construct ECU and control programs that are built-in and the RaridProunit to construct the plant (control targets such as motors, actuators, and sensors). These interfaces are arranged so that a hardware-in-the-loop simulation can be configured. The fundamental point is to automatically generate the C code for the ECU from the control model of the ECU created in upper processes in real time simulations using MaicroAutoBox and PapidPro. MaicroAutobox has a calculation performance that can reproduce the ECU, but a control period of100 MHz/10 nsec can be achieved by using an FPGA board, which is required for extremely high performance calculations of modeling related to power electronics and image recognition.
dSPACE HIL (Hardware-in-the-Loop) Simulation
Plant models, another vital key equivalent to ECUs in MDB, are refined by each user. The experience of the user is shown by what physical aspects should be embedded in the model. Evaluating the validity of a model is determined by rotating it through the V-cycle. Discrepancies in the model are found as a model moves to proceeding processes if the accuracy of the model is not sufficient because the system does not operate correctly, etc. If the cause of the discrepancies is the model, the problem is fixed and the V-cycle is repeated again.
In the case of automotive ECUs, one third of the source code is for diagnostics. It is necessary to confirm whether or not the control system is configured so as to prevent the system as a whole entering crisis mode as a result of a disturbance such as a broken wire, noise between a sensor and ECU, or plant failure-type damage.
For these checks, verifications are needed for various fault modes. Automatic testing using HILS is effective because as the system grows in size, the number of tests needed increases exponentially. Because real ECUs are naturally tested, plant simulation also has to be performed in real time.
Mr. Miyano's lecture about the extreme advantages of using MBD for ECUs and program development has been very informative. I asked Mr. Miyano to elaborate further for me as a designer close to plant design.
JMAG This has been very informative about the amazing advantages of using MBD for ECUs and program development, but implementing MBD doesn't seem to affect the JMAG users who are closer to plant design. What are the benefits of implementing the MBD environment for plant designers?
Mr. Miyano from dSPACE Demands for plants using MBD allow more specificity and detail. For example, there are requests like the torque variations of the motor need to be kept under X.XN-m. On one hand, the requirements may become stricter, but the sensitivity and the priority during optimization of the entire system becomes clear.
An optimal design for the components that meets system requirements (including over-spec review) is possible.
This final answer has cleared up any misunderstands I had.
MBD is something that engineers are hoping for if it has fair tradeoffs between the plant and control designers, and not whichever side has the loudest voice. This interview has really showed that the efficiency of development using MBD not only reduces the time of development, but also effectively shares information and the decisions that have been made.
Contact : dSPACE Japan Sales Department
TEL : 03-5798-5460
E-mail : email@example.com
How far has model based development spread? CAE edition
Issue 1 Asking an LMS engineer: Applying Model Based Development to Vibration and Sound Problems in Electrical Equipment
Explanation: Model-based Development
Final Issue: Model-based Development Requires the Ability to Expand, Shrink, and Share the Model
Issue 3: Easily Joining Complicated Physical Phenomena and Contributing to Improvements in Development Efficiency
Issue 2: Upgraded Functions for JMAG-RT
Issue 1: Efforts in JMAG for Model-based Design